Back Issues

 

Main Page

Amtrak Long-Distance Trains

Performance for February 2025

Forty-three percent of Amtrak's named long-distance trains arrived at their scheduled final destination on time or earlier in February 2025... The remaining trains, on average, arrived one hour and 34 minutes late.

_ _ _ _

This Month's Performance of Individual Trains . . . .

Auto Train .

California Zephyr .

Cardinal .

Carolinian .

City of New Orleans .

Coast Starlight .

Crescent .

Empire Builder .

Floridian ,

Lake Shore Limited .

Maple Leaf .

Palmetto .

Silver Meteor .

Southwest Chief .

Sunset Limited .

Texas Eagle .

Vermonter .

 

COMPOSITE - (Long-DistanceTrains, February 2025)

_ _ _ _ _ _ _

Eleven-year comparison for February . . .

 11-year comparison

 Pct on-time arrival

 Overall avg arrival

 Ave arrival if late

 February 2015

 38 %

 1 hour, 1 min late

 1 hour, 40 mins late

 February 2016

 50 %

 34 mins late

 1 hour, 7 mins late

 February 2017

 40 %

 50 mins late

 1 hour, 24 mins late

 February 2018

 37 %

 55 mins late

 1 hour, 27 mins late

 February 2019

 39 %

 1 hour, 13 mins late

 1 hour, 59 mins late

 February 2020

 48 %

 44 mins late

 1 hour, 26 mins late

 February 2021

 46 %

 1 hour, 3 mins late

 1 hour, 56 mins late

 February 2022

 46 %

 48 mins late

 1 hour, 29 mins late

 February 2023

 44 %

 53 mins late

 1 hour, 34 mins late

 February 2024

 49 %

 34 mins late

 1 hour, 7 mins late

 February 2025

 43 %

 54 mins late

 1 hour, 34 mins late

 

ABOUT THESE REPORTS:

The Bull Sheet calculates arrival performance at final destination of Amtrak's named long-distance trains. The data are based upon the reported arrival times of each of the affected trains, and there is no grace allowance for minimal lateness. If a train arrives at its final terminal behind schedule, even by a minute, it is considered 'late.' The Bull Sheet considers that long-distance Amtrak trains have sufficient padding in their schedule to offset typical en route delays, and it is not necessary to adopt a grace allowance on top of that padding to bolster on-time reporting. Accordingly, these reports offer a more realistic analysis than what is reported by Amtrak. Moreover, no consideration is given to the impact of late departures from originating points impacting subsequent late arrivals at destination, or for any time advanced during that run. Again, calculations refer solely to arrival at final terminal.

Data apply only to final destination, not to intermediate stops. Moreover, it does not identify causes for delay, or statistically apply responsibility to any of the host carriers involved en route.

Trains that are truncated, annulled, originated or terminated en route, or reported with incomplete or ambiguous data are excluded from the survey.

 

 

 

 

.

 

 

 

 

 

.